but this bullsh1t we get feed gets on my gander.
from one in five billion or whatever they quote, to a very good chance in his situation.
how does that work.
we are getting lied too
Boofy what if Mc Donald's started serving shark burgers would you eat them or are you a Hungry Jacks sort of guy
www.news.com.au/technology/science/animals/shark-attack-man-seriously-injured-surfing-at-lighthouse-beach-east-ballina/news-story/f815f5823b9be8a6c97da45d2a70799e
Wasnt a massive shark looking at the bite mark.
1 expect the gov to do more than they have. Which is nets and drum lines.
Theres a lot they could do. Now they are playing catch up.
Australians love there ocean. Thats a good enough reason for them to get cracking on some solutions - ie effective deterrents
The gov have taken away our right to protect ourselves from sharks by protecting them.
So it their obligation to protect us
A cull in that area wouldn't go astray they have been protected for a while now,they need a trimming.
You can't say there is not an issue in this area,I say screw the tree huggers most of them are land locked who
don't get in the ocean .Employ a sharp shooter set him up on the north wall and go nuts for a few months,if
all else fails use some live bait the drug dealing kind. Unfortunately these sharks are taking a liking to the easy human
pray and word has got around.If this offends some too bad your welcome to have your opinion.
No but better than what they presently have there. It's a trail. Let's see how they go before jumping to conclusions!
A trial would suggest that there must be a measure or some metric uponwhich success or failure is based!
So what's the metric?
I can only think of two, during the period of the trail, someone is either killed or maimed or no one is either killed or maimed!
Good trial