Search for a Location
  Clear Recents
Metro
South West
Central West
North West
  Surf Cameras
  Safety Bay Camera
Metro
North
Mid North
Illawarra
South Coast
Metro
West Coast
East Coast
Brisbane
Far North
Central Coast
Sunshine Coast
Gold Coast
Hobart
West Coast
North Coast
East Coast
Recent
Western Australia
New South Wales
Victoria
South Australia
Queensland
Northern Territory
Tasmania
  My Favourites
  Reverse Arrows
General
Gps & Speed Sailing
Wave Sailing
Foiling
Gear Reviews
Lost & Found
Windsurfing WA
Windsurfing NSW
Windsurfing QLD
Windsurfing Victoria
Windsurfing SA
Windsurfing Tasmania
General
Gear Reviews
Foiling
Newbies / Tips & Tricks
Lost & Found
Western Australia
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
South Australia
Tasmania
General
Foiling
Board Talk & Reviews
Wing Foiling
All
Windsurfing
Kitesurfing
Surfing
Longboarding
Stand Up Paddle
Wing Foiling
Sailing
  Active Topics
  Subscribed Topics
  Rules & Guidelines
Login
Lost My Details!
Join! (Its Free)
  Search for a Location
  Clear Recents
Metro
South West
Central West
North West
Surf Cameras
Safety Bay Camera
Metro
North
Mid North
Illawarra
South Coast
Metro
West Coast
East Coast
Brisbane
Far North
Central Coast
Sunshine Coast
Gold Coast
Hobart
West Coast
North Coast
East Coast
Recent
Western Australia
New South Wales
Victoria
South Australia
Queensland
Northern Territory
Tasmania
  My Favourites
  Reverse Arrows
All
Windsurfing
Kitesurfing
Surfing
Longboarding
Stand Up Paddle
Wing Foiling
Sailing
Active Topics
Subscribed Topics
Forum Rules
Login
Lost My Details!
Join! (Its Free)

Forums > Windsurfing Foiling

Why have kite foilers gone narrow with a lot of lean?

Reply
Created by Ian K > 9 months ago, 30 Sep 2019
Ian K
WA, 4120 posts
30 Sep 2019 5:18PM
Thumbs Up

But windfoilers have gone wide with not so much lean? All that weight on the wide rail generates a moment about the longitudinal axis that can only be counteracted by the mast generating lateral pressure.

The kite foil configuration has the mast generating a lot less lift, the greater inclination of the wing provides more counteraction to the lift of the sail.

This appeals to my sense of elegance. Generating your total hydrodynamic lift with one foil in the ideal direction has got to be associated with less drag than splitting the lift between two foils at right angles. (Pythagorus and all that - you're generating more total hydrodynamic lift to get the same resultant lift). As well as that the mast is a symmetric foil and won't have the lift to drag of an asymmetric one. ( With the mast generating less lift it can then be made thinner, as most of the forces will now be compression, i.e. less bending )

The only reason I can think of is that a large sail with a wide boom gets a little cramped on a narrow board. Why not have a travelling mast foot? Slides fully leeward to give you max leverage on the sail but not the width to inhibit the ability to crank the foil windward.



snides8
WA, 1731 posts
30 Sep 2019 5:29PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Ian K said..
But windfoilers have gone wide with not so much lean? All that weight on the wide rail generates a moment about the longitudinal axis that can only be counteracted by the mast generating lateral pressure.

The kite foil configuration has the mast generating a lot less lift, the greater inclination of the wing provides more counteraction to the lift of the sail.

This appeals to my sense of elegance. Generating your total hydrodynamic lift with one foil in the ideal direction has got to be associated with less drag than splitting the lift between two foils at right angles. (Pythagorus and all that - you're generating more total hydrodynamic lift to get the same resultant lift). As well as that the mast is a symmetric foil and won't have the lift to drag of an asymmetric one. ( With the mast generating less lift it can then be made thinner, as most of the forces will now be compression, i.e. less bending )

The only reason I can think of is that a large sail with a wide boom gets a little cramped on a narrow board. Why not have a travelling mast foot? Slides fully leeward to give you max leverage on the sail but not the width to inhibit the ability to crank the foil windward.





A traveller.....
mast foot sliding across the board has already been trialled here last year by scargo.
i haven't tried it but sean could elaborate more if he sees this.
I think he had his actually sliding to windward not leeward.

Subsonic
WA, 3209 posts
30 Sep 2019 6:56PM
Thumbs Up

The dynamics of having a much bigger airborne power source which sits well away from you and isn't attached to the board is what allows for a reduced board and foil platform. As you say, having the sail on the board, right there with you means you need some width to provide distance there to begin with.

Wider foil wings and longer foil masts also create a need for more width, to give the rider more leverage on the foil when everything is loaded up

CJW
NSW, 1721 posts
30 Sep 2019 9:41PM
Thumbs Up

With a wider board when it is cranked over you have more righting moment over the sail as you are effectively 'hanging' off the boom further out, that's why a wide board is faster. You also have a larger vertical force component on the rail compared to a narrow board as you stance is more vertical for the same righting moment which helps keep the foil in the water.

That all said, we don't generate near the power the kites do, they run up to 24m^2 kites, which is why we can't heal the board that hard until we are super powered up. They also run much much smaller foils as they can use the kite's huge lifting component when it's light to negate the need for so much foil lift. As subsonic said a wide foil can get tricky to control on a narrow board and most light wind race foils now are 900-1000mm wide. People have tried all sorts of stuff but the simplicity of the wide board just works.

Ian K
WA, 4120 posts
30 Sep 2019 8:04PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Subsonic said..


Wider foil wings and longer foil masts also create a need for more width, to give the rider more leverage on the foil when everything is loaded up

In my thought experiment that's where the argument becomes circular.

.The width is needed to counter the leverage on the mast.
.The reason you have to have hydrodynamic leverage on the mast is because of the width of the board. You can't bank it far enough to windward without dipping a rail.

But then again, the top windfoilers are mostly ex Formula racers. They're used to sailing off a fin. They did it for decades. Of course they will want to sail off the mast, They're comfortable just using the foil to replace the vertical lift that used to be provided by a planing hull.

That's all a bit speculative of course, just thinking out loud. I'm still a beginner on a free ride foil with an old-timers flat learning curve.

(The foils, even if wider are still balanced, the resultant foil lift goes straight up the mast and doesn't contribute to moments about the longitudinal axis down the centre of the board.)




Ian K
WA, 4120 posts
30 Sep 2019 8:08PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
CJW said..
With a wider board when it is cranked over you have more righting moment over the sail as you are effectively 'hanging' off the boom further out, that's why a wide board is faster. You also have a larger vertical force component on the rail compared to a narrow board as you stance is more vertical for the same righting moment which helps keep the foil in the water.

That all said, we don't generate near the power the kites do, they run up to 24m^2 kites, which is why we can't heal the board that hard until we are super powered up. They also run much much smaller foils as they can use the kite's huge lifting component when it's light to negate the need for so much foil lift. As subsonic said a wide foil can get tricky to control on a narrow board and most light wind race foils now are 900-1000mm wide. People have tried all sorts of stuff but the simplicity of the wide board just works.


Yes but you only have your body weight to play with, what you hang off the boom has to come off your feet.

Do you think you could solve the sail righting aspect by a lateral mast base traveller?

scarrgo
WA, 193 posts
30 Sep 2019 8:18PM
Thumbs Up

Yep been there done that was a few interesting ideas I tried around that time last year
Made 2 prototypes, first one proved the concept was possible and the second one was actually very functional however in the end had no positive impact on performance
But yes I was working under the thinking of bringing all the mast foot pressure to the windward side of the board may be an advantage and the first prototype made it apparent that when sailing upwind this is where the track would slide anyway, did try sailing with it locked to the leeward side with the first proto but proved to be rather uncomfortable and detrimental to performance. Anyway was satisfied after playing around with it for a while that there were negligible to no performance advantages and just made the sailing even more complicated

Ian K
WA, 4120 posts
30 Sep 2019 8:34PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
scarrgo said..
Yep been there done that was a few interesting ideas I tried around that time last year
Made 2 prototypes, first one proved the concept was possible and the second one was actually very functional however in the end had no positive impact on performance
But yes I was working under the thinking of bringing all the mast foot pressure to the windward side of the board may be an advantage and the first prototype made it apparent that when sailing upwind this is where the track would slide anyway, did try sailing with it locked to the leeward side with the first proto but proved to be rather uncomfortable and detrimental to performance. Anyway was satisfied after playing around with it for a while that there were negligible to no performance advantages and just made the sailing even more complicated


Just shows to go, nothing is new, all been thought of before.

You found it uncomfortable with track to leeward, but what if the straps went inboard to follow the mast? i.e.. On a narrower board?

boardsurfr
WA, 2425 posts
30 Sep 2019 10:11PM
Thumbs Up

Too bad Jim Drake is dead. I'd love to see a forces diagram like the ones he made for windsurfing. Seems that the kite has an "up" force component that easily adjustable by changing the kite angle. I'd guess that the kite can be used to "carry" most of the kiter's weight. Windsurfers have relatively more fixed angles, and the forward and sideways force components are larger than the "up" component.

For kite foiling, balancing the forces seems straightforward, with the foil's COE being between the feet, and the foil angle compensating for sideways forces. Windfoiling if more complicated. A substantial part of the force from a windsurf sail has to be transmitted through the mast base. Relative to the foils COE, the mast base is "off balance". This must be balanced with other "misaligned" forces, like feet being far off-center and a large mast. Moving the mast track to windward only helps with respect to the sideways imbalance, but not with respect to the lengthwise imbalance.

In theory, a sail design that allows for an attachment much further back, aligned with the front wind COE, should allow for a more kite-like stance and board tilt. That's quite a large design change relative to current windsurfing sails, though. But the changes in boards and sails between the earliest wind foils and now certainly go in that direction, with shorter clew lengths and mast bases further back. Even so, the wider boards are needed to allow maximum "counterbalancing".

PaulUK
12 posts
1 Oct 2019 11:31PM
Thumbs Up

It's an interesting topic. One point that A Albeau mentioned is that the kite foil angle allows them to use the kite to keep the foil in the water as it generates more lift at higher speed. Windfoil sails don't generally seem to do that - though some do claim to generate downforce.

Geometry suggests our larger width foils would also break to the surface sooner if heavily tilted,

segler
WA, 1632 posts
1 Oct 2019 11:56PM
Thumbs Up

..which is why the all-out racing foils have REALLY long masts, such as 110 cm. You can tilt them over at steep angles and still keep the long-span wings in the water.

Ian K
WA, 4120 posts
2 Oct 2019 7:44AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
PaulUK said..
It's an interesting topic. One point that A Albeau mentioned is that the kite foil angle allows them to use the kite to keep the foil in the water as it generates more lift at higher speed. Windfoil sails don't generally seem to do that - though some do claim to generate downforce.

Geometry suggests our larger width foils would also break to the surface sooner if heavily tilted,



That's a good point. The vertical lift varies with the Cosine of the lean angle. But the Cosine curve is pretty flat around 90 degrees. At 45 degrees a bit of angle tweak is becoming useful. Tweaking it down to 43 degrees a kiter would lose more lift than from between 80 to 78. Of course they'd accelerate upwind if they didn't sheet the kite on. Aeronautics 101, you lose height if you bank too hard.

Subsonic
WA, 3209 posts
2 Oct 2019 7:05PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Ian K said..

PaulUK said..
It's an interesting topic. One point that A Albeau mentioned is that the kite foil angle allows them to use the kite to keep the foil in the water as it generates more lift at higher speed. Windfoil sails don't generally seem to do that - though some do claim to generate downforce.

Geometry suggests our larger width foils would also break to the surface sooner if heavily tilted,




That's a good point. The vertical lift varies with the Cosine of the lean angle. But the Cosine curve is pretty flat around 90 degrees. At 45 degrees a bit of angle tweak is becoming useful. Tweaking it down to 43 degrees a kiter would lose more lift than from between 80 to 78. Of course they'd accelerate upwind if they didn't sheet the kite on. Aeronautics 101, you lose height if you bank too hard.


If the stance perth kite foilers use going upwind is anything to go by, they'll all Be making regular trips to the chiropractor by age 40/50.

LeeD
3939 posts
4 Oct 2019 2:11AM
Thumbs Up

Lean of board is similar for upwind work.
WS foil is bigger, to lift rider and rig, so more force is needed to hold it leaned over.
Kite can give more than 2/3 the lift needed, so foil is smaller and easier to maintain lift going upwind.

WhiteofHeart
764 posts
4 Oct 2019 3:26PM
Thumbs Up

And that while PWA riders start riding their foilboards flatter and flatter. If you look at the top WF1 guns they're really not banking the board towindward much anymore!

The more you bank, the more the wind pushes down the nose and the lower you fly / less front foot power you get. For maximum performance you want the wind to lift the nose, resulting in more power! This is still very possible while still having the board a few deg towindward with the correct nose rocker and a wide nose. Its all a balance.

People forget to factor in the wind, but when going 20-25kts against 15kts of wind the big nose of a formula or WF91 board catches a lot of wind, really changing the distribution of forces.

Gonzalo Costa Hoevel explained it all really well in a video, I'm trying to find it..

EDIT: Think its this one but dont have the time to go through 50min of video:

EDIT: its at 23:20 ;)

m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2757803107587603&id=159452045352

Paducah
2615 posts
4 Oct 2019 9:23PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
WhiteofHeart said..
Gonzalo Costa Hoevel explained it all really well in a video, I'm trying to find it..

EDIT: Think its this one but dont have the time to go through 50min of video:

EDIT: its at 23:20 ;)

m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2757803107587603&id=159452045352


How to tell when someone is posting from work...



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Windsurfing Foiling


"Why have kite foilers gone narrow with a lot of lean?" started by Ian K