Luderitz Boards

Select to expand quote

mr love said..

I was absolutely stoked that Martin asked me to do this, it is really exciting and I am so looking forward to see how they perform.

You should be very proud Martin. It is awesome that the previous designs worked so well that MVM has asked for more. I look forward to seeing photos of the finished product and more importantly, seeing it do 50kn+ in October. Congratulations on your design.

Sausage, On the previous 3 I designed him the 44/49 and 54, and this one yes no steps, these are pretty much my designs based on what I have been messing around with for the last few years. The other 2 for Luderitz I won't comment on yet, you will have to wait and see He is producing the Monster 66 in his factory in Poland, the stepped GPS/Slalom board which is apparently bloody good, very keen to take one for a spin at some stage.

And I forgot to mention Tony is also part of the Vic Speed team heading over, Doh, sorry mate. See you all Friday

And it is well on the way.

Looking good! I like the shape and the double concave to v is definitely something I'd like on my board.

Appears Martin let the cat out of the bag on facebook re the cutouts on the 42. Here tis.

?

Sausage, yep I thought about it a lot, would have modeled one if I had more time, but had too many projects on the go. Then I would have had to bribe Martin to build one.
Hey he will only put a starboard tack front strap on, that is asymmetrical!!!!

I guess we will find out!!!!
I spoke obviously alot to Martin about the track at Ludertitz and his experience there last year. Also looked at alot of vision of the guy;s sailing the trench and at the GPS tracks. What was obvious is that you need really good entry speed into the course to get a top 500 metre time. Martin was saying that the starting area was a bit gusty and it could be tricky to get going and the distance to the first timing gate is not that far. So what we thought could be an interesting approach is a board that is a little bigger and easier to get started, less of that short runup wasted trying to get going and more energy preserved for the run.Yet obviously the board also has to be fast at the bottom of the course.
So we did a slightly biiger board ( it,s still bloody small I reckon) we have added some cutouts to reduce wetted area in the tail resulting in the bottom surface area from 750 to the tail being the same for the 40 and the 42. The aspect ratio of the planing surface on the 42 ends up slightly higher and it has a touch more volume so it should be easier to get planing and accellerate a bit quicker, thats the idea anyway. As the wetted surface in the 'business end" of the board is the same it should have roughly the same drag related to surface area.

It is not often you get to play at a place like Luderitz so we though, OK, do one board that is safe..ish, and that is the 40, then try some stuff, so we have 2X42 wide boards with different shape cutouts and different rocker and V setups. I guess we will learn some s..t!!!!

Should we start a book on which one goes the fastest? hey if they float then I have done my job

Select to expand quote

mr love said..

, very similar rocker and slightly reduced V . The second is similar to the 40, slightly different size but has some funky stuff going on in the tail. The third is a collaboration between Martin and myself using some ideas from Martins vast speed experience the result being a different rocker and V setup. It again has some different funky stuff going on in the tail.

martin the board looks great with a lot of hrs put in to design and detail but no mention about the rocker,I have noticed the fins for luderitz are wider with more rake, have you made any changes to the rocker to compensate for the board rideing flatter in the water, i have noticed the higher the rake the less lift , the trend has gone over the years from a vertical slalom to something like a c3 slingshot 30deg, and now a wider based 35 to 40 deg , the boards with the 35 to 40deg rake are better behaved but sit flatter in the water, have you done anything to the bottom to compensate or doesn't it matter

"edit" correct me if im wrong, is the top diagram ass about,

^^^No,no,no.They're "speed holes" to reduce weight.