Forums > Windsurfing   Gps and Speed talk

Wingssails Speed Special 5.6

Reply
Created by wingssails > 9 months ago, 6 Aug 2011
wingssails
WA, 15 posts
6 Aug 2011 6:08PM
Thumbs Up

Hi all, i am Stefano Basso from Italy, i am sail designer of wingssails, sails the world's most compact, I created the SUPER COMPACT SAIL DESIGN CONCEPT
this is the wingssails speed special 5.6
forum.windsurfing.nl/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=13868245





for more info
Stefano Basso facebook profile
WINGSSAILS group profile

wingssails
WA, 15 posts
6 Aug 2011 6:12PM
Thumbs Up

forgot,
5.6 square meters
LUFF 396cm
BOOM 155-157cm

nebbian
WA, 6277 posts
6 Aug 2011 7:36PM
Thumbs Up

Wow, I've never seen anything look like that before

Just a question, is batten number 4 a bit too short? It looks like it could do with a bit more tension.

Be interested to hear how it performs

djdojo
VIC, 1610 posts
7 Aug 2011 2:06AM
Thumbs Up

Jeezuz, talk about violating every principle of good design, especially K.I.S.S.

Your sail looks Frankensteinian: an ad hoc conglomeration of band-aids upon band-aids desperately trying to patch over the absence of any real comprehension of the relationship between luff-curve, mast-curve, tension distribution, seam shaping and twist.

I remember, as a grommet, reading an interview with Phil McGain in 1987 or so. He was asked about his design process, and his answer was etched in my mind from that moment on: "Take the SIMPLE designs that are working well and refine those designs." You could do worse than to meditate on those words. Good luck.



wingssails
WA, 15 posts
7 Aug 2011 1:23AM
Thumbs Up

Hi nebbian, thank you, here are some photos of the sail in action.
the sailor is Jan Walters from Holland





Setup:
Fanatic Falcon Speed
Caspar speed 25
Wingssails Speed Special 5.6, luff 397, boom 155.
Conditions:
Den Helder, het Kuitje. Flat water, angle about 120 degrees, gusts 24 knots.
Jan Wolters:
Sail feels suuuper easy. Easy to handle, especially upwind.
Very light in the hands. But, luckily, it's still powerfull. No problem with planing at all. Also enough drive downwind.
Almost never sailed a sail that handles and sails this light.

average speed 36knots - 66.6 km/h
top speed 37knots - 68.7 km/h

wingssails
WA, 15 posts
7 Aug 2011 1:44AM
Thumbs Up

Hi nebbian, this is the SUPER COMPACT SAIL DESIGN CONCEPT:

THE MOST COMPACT SAILS IN THE WORLD
WINGSSAILS PRESENTS:THE SUPER COMPACT SAIL DESIGN THE MOST COMPACT SAILS IN THE WORLD by Stefano Basso Wings sails presents the super compact sail design concept It 's a design concept that involves sail mast and boom, that is, the rig. The goal is simple, reduce the rigid parts that make up the rig, analyzing the points: - Reduction of the length of the boom - Reduction of the length of the mast - Reduce the number of battens The result: - Sails lighter - Rig lighter - Increased top speed - Improved acceleration - Increased Maneuverability - Lower costs The unique design of Wings sails allows for super compact sails but with well proportioned lines and elegant. No sails with stubby lines
Di: Stefano Basso

AUS4
NSW, 1277 posts
7 Aug 2011 11:05AM
Thumbs Up

nebbian said...

Wow, I've never seen anything look like that before

Just a question, is batten number 4 a bit too short? It looks like it could do with a bit more tension.

Be interested to hear how it performs


That crease is coming from the 5th batten being too soft in the back end causing the batten to bend upwards thus creating the crease.

mr love
VIC, 2376 posts
7 Aug 2011 11:29AM
Thumbs Up

djdojo,
Man , what is your beef???? Here is a bloke willing to give it a go. Puts money and effort into trying some ideas and all you can do is bag the crap out of him.
I think it's great we have people in this sport willing to give it a go, who cares if the first attempt may not be absulutely perfect, his next will be better. Good on him and it should be encouraged.

How has your ultra negative post contributed to our great sport???

wingssails
WA, 15 posts
7 Aug 2011 11:10AM
Thumbs Up

Thanks mr Love!!!

slowboat
WA, 560 posts
7 Aug 2011 12:53PM
Thumbs Up

djdojo said...

Jeezuz, talk about violating every principle of good design, especially K.I.S.S.

Your sail looks Frankensteinian: an ad hoc conglomeration of band-aids upon band-aids desperately trying to patch over the absence of any real comprehension of the relationship between luff-curve, mast-curve, tension distribution, seam shaping and twist.

I remember, as a grommet, reading an interview with Phil McGain in 1987 or so. He was asked about his design process, and his answer was etched in my mind from that moment on: "Take the SIMPLE designs that are working well and refine those designs." You could do worse than to meditate on those words. Good luck.



Brendan, I know you have a PM shrine set up somewhere in your flat... How is an industry run by a bunch of guys copying each other and "refining it" any good for the sport?

Theres plenty of room for people having a go at design. Its great to see, and the sport needs more of this. Bravo Stefano.

lelos12345
NSW, 453 posts
7 Aug 2011 8:07PM
Thumbs Up

veramente bella Stefano ! forza ITALIA !! spero che arrivano qui !

see i can spell ;-)

raffaeu
195 posts
7 Aug 2011 10:42PM
Thumbs Up

Hi Stefano, I am italian too but I live in Bermuda.
Great to see some 'italians' are still applying in this sport.
Anyway, how can we order or evaluate your products?

petermac33
WA, 6415 posts
8 Aug 2011 1:35AM
Thumbs Up

my 2009 5.6m race-sail is 432cm luff, 180 boom, so this sail with 396 luff/155 boom is quite different in design.

with a much shorter luff the power is closer to your body so in theory should be easier to hold on to in stronger winds and feel lighter.

the very short boom should increase stiffness.

the foot of the sail looks cut quite low, i can see the end of the bottom batten dragging in the water not to mention my toes in strap hitting foot of sail.

concept is great,love to try one out.

slowboat
WA, 560 posts
8 Aug 2011 9:58AM
Thumbs Up

FYI the NP 5.5m has a 398 luff.

yoyo
WA, 1646 posts
8 Aug 2011 12:07PM
Thumbs Up

djdojo, Communication Skills Coach.... hmm...
Not sure if there are any advantages in Wingsails 5.6 over a Severne Reflex, Pryde Evo or any of the other good speed sails but at least he made a much better effort showing off his skills at sailmaking than you did in your choosen field.

djdojo
VIC, 1610 posts
9 Aug 2011 1:01AM
Thumbs Up

If this is a backyard effort, then my apologies for such a brutal critique, but if this is a serious designer, then perhaps a provocative critique might prompt some better ideas.

If I strip back the gratuitous metaphors, my message might turn out something like this:

It looks a bit like a triangle of high tension from the clew to the front of the third batten to the foot, with much less tension within this triangle (for which batten load can only compensate so much), and the roach area just floppy. While this may create an even progressive twist in a static situation, it is unlikely to retain that continuity of twist and shape distribution (and therefore stability of centre of effort) through gusts and over chop.

Having lots of bits and pieces of battens and tack straps and stuff can get the static shape where you want it, but only by a smooth integration of mast and batten curves and loads can you achieve a rig that responds dynamically in ways that self-organise to make the most of gusts, lulls, and bumps while giving the rider a smooth and controllable ride. This self-organising responsiveness has been the holy grail of race/speed sail development since Bruce Peterson and Dave Russell hooked up with Gaastra and their ADTR contraption in the late 80s and coined terms like "free-leech" and "progressive twist" as they started to attend to the dynamic aspects of their designs.

There are now 20 years worth of examples of ways in which designers have played with these factors with evolutionary steps. The core structure is the same: circular carbon mast, monofilm sail body, wider-than-mast luff sleeve, fiberglass battens, plastic camber inducers and a boom to hang on to. There have been no revolutions in the past twenty years, just refinements of this basic model. The recessed clew is a standard now but has been in and out of vogue for ages. Hot Sails Maui had them in the early 90s.

The design ideas evident in this "speed special" cannot be defended on the grounds of progressing the sport, because there is nothing new there. Either bring something radically new: (a la footstrap, camber inducer, carbon spars, high aspect fins), or refine what is already kicking arse.

Perhaps this is more constructive than my first post, perhaps not. Perhaps if this had been in the general forum under "look, I made my first sail!" I would have been more encouraging, but it was made as a post from a commercial sailmaker in what I've previously perceived as an elite speed forum. If my perception has been inaccurate, I apologise.

slowboat
WA, 560 posts
9 Aug 2011 11:05AM
Thumbs Up

oh the joy of the language barrier

sailquik
VIC, 6154 posts
9 Aug 2011 5:08PM
Thumbs Up

djdojo said...


(snip)
There are now 20 years worth of examples of ways in which designers have played with these factors with evolutionary steps.


Well........ I have been saying exactly that about surfboards! Shapers are just playing with the details and going round in circles. Funny how every shaper I mention this to takes great offense........

djdojo
VIC, 1610 posts
11 Aug 2011 12:08AM
Thumbs Up

To those who red-thumbed my second post in this thread, was it because you were still cross with me for my first post, or was there something about the second post that was offensive in and of itself? Serious question, as the objections to the first post were pretty clear, but the second?

Clearly my tone in the first post was out of line, and would perhaps barely have been in order even if the sail in question had been made by Kai Hopf and he'd asked for my considered opinion in private. For this I'd like to say sorry to Stefano and others who were offended.

To those who are seriously interested in going faster than 50 knots, a rigorous discussion of design principles and examples is surely desirable, no? We trade rougher blows than this in the kiting forums all the time (even with posters whose mother tongue is not English), and for those who search beyond the rhetoric and chest-thumping there are often valid insights to be had.

Stefano, would you like discussion of your sail's design, or did you just want to show it to us? What are your goals as a sailmaker? Fun, personal satisfaction, commercial profit, 50knots?

mineral1
WA, 4564 posts
10 Aug 2011 10:37PM
Thumbs Up

djdojo said...

To those who red-thumbed my second post in this thread, was it because you were still cross with me for my first post, or was there something about the second post that was offensive in and of itself? Serious question, as the objections to the first post were pretty clear, but the second?

Clearly my tone in the first post was out of line, and would perhaps barely have been in order even if the sail in question had been made by Kai Hopf and he'd asked for my considered opinion in private. For this I'd like to say sorry to Stefano and others who were offended.

To those who are seriously interested in going faster than 50 knots, a rigorous discussion of design principles and examples is surely desirable, no? We trade rougher blows than this in the kiting forums all the time (even with posters whose mother tongue is not English), and for those who search beyond the rhetoric and chest-thumping there are often valid insights to be had.

Stefano, would you like discussion of your sail's design, or did you just want to show it to us? What are your goals as a sailmaker? Fun, personal satisfaction, commercial profit, 50knots?


You made me laugh anyway I just watched an episode of Big Bang Theory, and your post sounded just like something Sheldon would say
Don't take it to heart digger, it just comes across in the manner Sheldon would deliver his lines.

djdojo
VIC, 1610 posts
11 Aug 2011 12:44AM
Thumbs Up

sailquik said...

Well........ I have been saying exactly that about surfboards! Shapers are just playing with the details and going round in circles. Funny how every shaper I mention this to takes great offense........



I don't think sail designers are going around in circles. Clearly gear is getting better, but the returns on the current structure are diminishing. For those who've not been involved for decades or who've not trawled the history books, here's a little list of some significant moments in speed. I've added the equipment innovations that were involved in each.

1982 Pascal Maka 27.82 (fully battened sail, board designed for speed, not just a wave sinker)
1983 Fred Haywood 30.82 (wing mast)
1986 Pascal Maka 38.68 (camber inducers)
1988 Erik Beale 40.30 (higher aspect non-dolphin fin)
1993 Thierry Bielak 45.34 (monofilm sail, carbon mast)
2004 Finian Maynard 46.82 (carbon boom)
2008 Antoine Albeau 49.09

It took just 4 years of design revolution to get from 28 knots to 39 knots. It took another 22 years of evolution to get the next ten knot improvement. There is only so much that can be squeezed from a given platform.

Still, the current Pryde RS sails and the North Warps are proof that there are divergent (not copying) ways of refining the platform while still getting great performance. Perhaps they'll take certain variables to extremes that then allow or demand radical innovation of other parameters. Or perhaps a whole new idea will emerge fully formed without evolutionary precedent.

Despite certain apparently absolute limits of fin performance that seem to be limiting things at the moment I think something that is recognisably a windsurfer will go well over 50knots, but if history tells us anything, it will need to be a design that contains novelty and elegance in equal measure.

Victor B
WA, 130 posts
10 Aug 2011 10:45PM
Thumbs Up

It can be easy to criticise...Green thumbs to someone having a go at designing and putting his money into the sport. Red thumbs because the "communication" was a put down...I perceived it that way (and it appears others did too).

A bit of diplomacy goes a long way in my book, regardless of whether you are right, wrong or indifferent.



SWS
SA, 196 posts
11 Aug 2011 8:56AM
Thumbs Up

The sail looks interesting it is a pity we are not in Italy to give it a go.

djdojo
VIC, 1610 posts
11 Aug 2011 10:16AM
Thumbs Up

Victor B said...

It can be easy to criticise...Green thumbs to someone having a go at designing and putting his money into the sport. Red thumbs because the "communication" was a put down...I perceived it that way (and it appears others did too).

A bit of diplomacy goes a long way in my book, regardless of whether you are right, wrong or indifferent.



Hmm, it's also easy to say, "wow that look's interesting," as though you were talking about nondescript postmodern art, but perhaps less easy to give a precise critique.

If it seems like a putdown for me to distinguish between those who are interested in playing with making stuff for fun and those who are seriously chasing elite performance, then that is surely in the eye of the beholder. I was following the lead of several earlier posters who defended the sail on those very grounds (that it was an early effort etc). I'm a hack pianist, I don't expect my playing to be critiqued as though I was Murray Perahia (unless I enter a professional Rachmaninov competition or an elite pianists' web forum), but nor do I feel offended if I'm referred to as an amateur or beginner. Expecting to be granted the immunity that comes with amateur status necessarily implies the acceptance of such status. I've already apologised for failing to make the distinction in my initial post.

It can be a fine line between diplomacy and the wilful encouragement of delusion. This is a speed forum; do you expect your GPS unit to be diplomatic and tell you you did 48 knots when in fact you did 36?

I'm glad some have found a bit of humour in my rantings (some of it was even intended). I'll take my didactic Fawltyesque persona back to kite-land now. Let me know when and how you top 50 for 500m. (Ah, look, my brand new e-bay flame-suit has arrived in the nick of time!)

choco
SA, 4093 posts
11 Aug 2011 11:07AM
Thumbs Up

djdojo said...

Victor B said...

It can be easy to criticise...Green thumbs to someone having a go at designing and putting his money into the sport. Red thumbs because the "communication" was a put down...I perceived it that way (and it appears others did too).

A bit of diplomacy goes a long way in my book, regardless of whether you are right, wrong or indifferent.



Hmm, it's also easy to say, "wow that look's interesting," as though you were talking about nondescript postmodern art, but perhaps less easy to give a precise critique.

If it seems like a putdown for me to distinguish between those who are interested in playing with making stuff for fun and those who are seriously chasing elite performance, then that is surely in the eye of the beholder. I was following the lead of several earlier posters who defended the sail on those very grounds (that it was an early effort etc). I'm a hack pianist, I don't expect my playing to be critiqued as though I was Murray Perahia (unless I enter a professional Rachmaninov competition or an elite pianists' web forum), but nor do I feel offended if I'm referred to as an amateur or beginner. Expecting to be granted the immunity that comes with amateur status necessarily implies the acceptance of such status. I've already apologised for failing to make the distinction in my initial post.

It can be a fine line between diplomacy and the wilful encouragement of delusion. This is a speed forum; do you expect your GPS unit to be diplomatic and tell you you did 48 knots when in fact you did 36?

I'm glad some have found a bit of humour in my rantings (some of it was even intended). I'll take my didactic Fawltyesque persona back to kite-land now. Let me know when and how you top 50 for 500m. (Ah, look, my brand new e-bay flame-suit has arrived in the nick of time!)


Kites are wind powered(where the similarities end) but they are not a sail craft, sail powered craft have a mast, boom and a "sail" for means of propulsion two different sports entirely so you can't compare the speed of windsurfer/sailboat to a kite, unless of course you fix the kite to a mast, boom and attach it onto a hull then we can compare apples to apples.
A windsurfing sail is more efficent than a kite, kites overcome these inefficiencies through brute horse power, so yes please crawl back to where you come from[}:)] you should be comparing your speeds to para gliders got alot more in common.

djdojo
VIC, 1610 posts
11 Aug 2011 2:16PM
Thumbs Up

choco said...
Kites are wind powered(where the similarities end) but they are not a sail craft, sail powered craft have a mast, boom and a "sail" for means of propulsion two different sports entirely so you can't compare the speed of windsurfer/sailboat to a kite, unless of course you fix the kite to a mast, boom and attach it onto a hull then we can compare apples to apples.
A windsurfing sail is more efficent than a kite, kites overcome these inefficiencies through brute horse power, so yes please crawl back to where you come from[}:)] you should be comparing your speeds to para gliders got alot more in common.


Back where I came from? I can only hope Chris (slowie) and any other lurking old mates get a chuckle from that.

My point was not kites vs windsurfers, but the merits of rigorous discussion, where appropriate (and I've already accepted that I may have misjudged that in this instance), in the service of good design.

For those who don't know I used to design and build slalom boards for myself and others under the auspices of Caveman (R.I.P. Andy) as well as being involved with Sailworks R+D. I won my share of races in Australia (some at "the Pit") and on Maui on the gear I built or had a hand in designing. Although it's a while since I had a wad of styrofoam underfoot I take an active interest in windsurfing's development and would love to see some design breakthroughs.

I've sailed boats (competitively), sailboards (professionally) and kites (recreationally) and the "kiting isn't sailing" thing really strikes me as arbitrary. It could as well be twisted around to "sailing involves mast stays so therefore sailboards and lasers aren't sailing craft but kites are because they have stays supporting their inflatable mast." I could also say sail has an inflatable mast, inflatable battens, and an even more compact boom than Stefano's that's got a pair of 25m inhaul lines attaching it to the mast and 25m outhaul lines attaching it to the two clews.

Decades ago traditionalist yachties were appalled that small recreational catamarans could whoop their expensive keelboats in some conditions and decried it as "not proper sailing." Now we've had multihulls in the America's cup for some years and somehow the world hasn't fallen apart.

You can defend historically defined patches of turf or you can wonder, "what might we learn from other related but different fields?" As others have asked me, which option is more likely to "progress the sport?"

slowboat
WA, 560 posts
11 Aug 2011 2:32PM
Thumbs Up

choco
SA, 4093 posts
11 Aug 2011 5:06PM
Thumbs Up

djdojo said...

choco said...
Kites are wind powered(where the similarities end) but they are not a sail craft, sail powered craft have a mast, boom and a "sail" for means of propulsion two different sports entirely so you can't compare the speed of windsurfer/sailboat to a kite, unless of course you fix the kite to a mast, boom and attach it onto a hull then we can compare apples to apples.
A windsurfing sail is more efficient than a kite, kites overcome these inefficiencies through brute horse power, so yes please crawl back to where you come from[}:)] you should be comparing your speeds to para gliders got alot more in common.


Back where I came from? I can only hope Chris (slowie) and any other lurking old mates get a chuckle from that.

My point was not kites vs windsurfers, but the merits of rigorous discussion, where appropriate (and I've already accepted that I may have misjudged that in this instance), in the service of good design.

For those who don't know I used to design and build slalom boards for myself and others under the auspices of Caveman (R.I.P. Andy) as well as being involved with Sailworks R+D. I won my share of races in Australia (some at "the Pit") and on Maui on the gear I built or had a hand in designing. Although it's a while since I had a wad of styrofoam underfoot I take an active interest in windsurfing's development and would love to see some design breakthroughs.

I've sailed boats (competitively), sailboards (professionally) and kites (recreationally) and the "kiting isn't sailing" thing really strikes me as arbitrary. It could as well be twisted around to "sailing involves mast stays so therefore sailboards and lasers aren't sailing craft but kites are because they have stays supporting their inflatable mast." I could also say sail has an inflatable mast, inflatable battens, and an even more compact boom than Stefano's that's got a pair of 25m inhaul lines attaching it to the mast and 25m outhaul lines attaching it to the two clews.

Decades ago traditionalist yachties were appalled that small recreational catamarans could whoop their expensive keelboats in some conditions and decried it as "not proper sailing." Now we've had multihulls in the America's cup for some years and somehow the world hasn't fallen apart.

You can defend historically defined patches of turf or you can wonder, "what might we learn from other related but different fields?" As others have asked me, which option is more likely to "progress the sport?"


At least now I know where you came from and from all of your experience what have you learn't? enlighten me

kato
VIC, 3455 posts
11 Aug 2011 6:10PM
Thumbs Up

djdojo said...
Despite certain apparently absolute limits of fin performance that seem to be limiting things at the moment I think something that is recognisably a windsurfer will go well over 50knots, but if history tells us anything, it will need to be a design that contains novelty and elegance in equal measure.


I,m not sure that its the fin holding us back.We have fins that can do over 55kts and foil shapes that will perform at 100kts (Super Cav) Apart from the idiot thats driving,we are unable to use all the available wind when on the course so we rig a smaller sail, which reduces the drag and the power. If we can go down the kite path and use all the available wind and yet still have the control we may get to that 60kts. I,d love a sail that can be used in 10kt to 40kts and still maintain its shape and drive, so i can cruise into the course ,turn the corner and put my foot down. 50kt Pb

Victor B
WA, 130 posts
11 Aug 2011 10:00PM
Thumbs Up

I take back the diplomacy...and am going to keep it simple DjDojo - Put your money where your mouth is. red thumbs rule.

slowboat
WA, 560 posts
12 Aug 2011 11:55AM
Thumbs Up

djdojo said...
I've added the equipment innovations that were involved in each.

1982 Pascal Maka 27.82 (fully battened sail, board designed for speed, not just a wave sinker)
1983 Fred Haywood 30.82 (wing mast)
1986 Pascal Maka 38.68 (camber inducers)
1988 Erik Beale 40.30 (higher aspect non-dolphin fin)
1993 Thierry Bielak 45.34 (monofilm sail, carbon mast)
2004 Finian Maynard 46.82 (carbon boom)
2008 Antoine Albeau 49.09


Not wanting to blow your argument, but I'm not sure the items you list next to each of these specific speed milestones had a significant impact on those results.

Wing mast- helped or hindered? We'll never know... Looked really stiff to me, and where did we go from there? Back to round masts. I heard the wind was nuking that day...

Camber inducers- nice to use for racing as it keeps the sail cambered without load. Its not essential for speed but in most cases it does help.

Fins- if you havent noticed the raked back fins are working great. The transition to more refined foil designs happened a few years earlier than '88. But there were no breakthroughs in fin design at that time. I think the bigger contributor to Erik's record was the fact he did it in the canal soon after it was built (THE record machine as proven since) during a private attempt in great conditions.

Monofilm? It was used extensively from the late 80's. There was plenty of better material around but it was (is) a lot more expensive. It may have been revolutionary from a performance/cost ratio for production, but not overall performance.

I set one of my fastest ever sessions (and fastest at the time) on an Aluminium boom (48kts max). Short booms are always pretty stiff so being carbon didnt make a difference.

Anyway the point of elaborating on your list, is that what we used to believe was making a difference can now be proven quite easily with the massive global database of measurements from GPS that we can all access. Although there havent been any crazy material innovations, the application of those materials has definitely improved the sport.

The biggest improvement since the early-mid '90s was the introduction of high pressure batten systems. Then with the reintroduction of the wider sleeves, combined with the higher batten pressure. This increased the profile stability of the sails enormously. The batten system used in production race sails is pretty sweet now. Where to next? Where are the problems in the rig? That depends on how you tune it and for what conditions.

Wider luff sleeves, deeper profiles, more even skin tension further back in the sail, and effective dynamic twist has allowed us to be more balanced more of the time. The stability allows us to fully load the sail more of the time without suddenly changing the load on the board and fin as we sail into a gust or lull, allowing us to accelerate harder, and for longer.

The boards have evolved slightly, but more in response to changes in sail handling. Fins have improved in general, due mostly to market demand for quality in this area. With the other components becoming more balanced, the fin is more important than before- its no longer the "least of the unsolved problems". But there were a lot of really nice fins made from the late '80s... also a lot of really bad ones

I think the biggest reason people are going faster is interest in speed sailing due to the availability of GPS to objectively and conveniently measure performance. Thats new...



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Windsurfing   Gps and Speed talk


"Wingssails Speed Special 5.6" started by wingssails