Got the chance to try out a Superfreak (unknown year) in 4.7. Used an Ezzy mast 400. Sail rigged pretty flat, required tons of downhaul! Normal? Felt like I reached sufficient twist while nearly bottoming out.
Pulled the outhaul firm to unwrinkle the batten less zone. Profile looked pretty flat where the dacron just wants to spring back and not open up like stiffer material would.
Got to the water, perfect conditions were awaiting! Sail pulled nicely, swelling up. We can pump and get great lift in a springy powerful way. The pull is progressive, very stable and reliable straight in front of us.
Gusts don't seem to bother the sail, there's an elastic feel to the power delivery and it feels like it drives 80-90% of the wind power.
At the jibe I liked the drive the sail provided but at the flip it felt a bit slow and heavy. Same for tacks or simply laying it down. I believe a flextop mast could help there just not sure how much?
I'd say it felt s bit more than 4.7, coming from a recent Neilpryde TheFly in 4.8, it felt similar in pull force.
It has an Ezzy feel to it, depowers more easily but slower in transitions.
Going back to my north zeta, it's just as quiet but much more direct and way more reactive, more fun.
So too summarize, they work great when overpowered, pull on a plane nicely and keep the plane in light winds. Feel a bit heavier and slower to move around.
Makes a big difference if it is the "ME" version or "Classic" version? Also they have been refined allot over the years so if it was much older than 2019, the newer ones are lighter & more refined. If you get a chance to try again, you should watch the rigging video & use the correct mast. The down haul is much different compared to mono/x-ply sails harder to judge. Also the wrinkle next to the luff is supposed to be there to some extent. My experience using flextop sails with CC mast is they often feel heavier & lose allot of the slippery feel we like. All that said, you may or may not like it. The feel is unique. I like them but prefer my KS3...
If you just weigh a S Freak, you'd be put off by it's heavy dry weight.
Sailing is different, as it's still only a 4.7.
You do feel the weight in the 7.0.
Got the chance to try out a Superfreak (unknown year) in 4.7. Used an Ezzy mast 400. Sail rigged pretty flat, required tons of downhaul! Normal? Felt like I reached sufficient twist while nearly bottoming out.
Pulled the outhaul firm to unwrinkle the batten less zone. Profile looked pretty flat where the dacron just wants to spring back and not open up like stiffer material would.
Got to the water, perfect conditions were awaiting! Sail pulled nicely, swelling up. We can pump and get great lift in a springy powerful way. The pull is progressive, very stable and reliable straight in front of us.
Gusts don't seem to bother the sail, there's an elastic feel to the power delivery and it feels like it drives 80-90% of the wind power.
At the jibe I liked the drive the sail provided but at the flip it felt a bit slow and heavy. Same for tacks or simply laying it down. I believe a flextop mast could help there just not sure how much?
I'd say it felt s bit more than 4.7, coming from a recent Neilpryde TheFly in 4.8, it felt similar in pull force.
It has an Ezzy feel to it, depowers more easily but slower in transitions.
Going back to my north zeta, it's just as quiet but much more direct and way more reactive, more fun.
So too summarize, they work great when overpowered, pull on a plane nicely and keep the plane in light winds. Feel a bit heavier and slower to move around.
I had a small quiver of superfreaks UL 4.7+5.3 about 12 (or is it 15?) years ago and I liked them but eventually sold because the low end performance was just too lacking. What was somewhat nice in a gust (you did not really feel it, nor accelerate ...) was also not so nice when you needed it, for example to start planing. Overall they felt a bit like a yo-yo. They did not last too long (the thin UL dacron the culprit) and eventually I switched to Firelights that I really liked. Much more powerful and consistent and at least as good when powered up. Loved the first generation firelights, but I got a replacement 5.0 in 2018 after my old 5.0 disintegrated in small foil crash, and I could never figure it out. Somehow the low end was gone. It was kind of disconcerting how the sail switched off when you did not want it too. I tried a Q4AD (first generation ... it collapsed the front when overpowered in a gust), and then KS3 for a season (4.3 and 4.9). They were nice but slow and lacking drive. I finally ended a 25 years long relationship with Hot Sails Maui sails when I switched to a Point-7. 2020-2021 Spy quiver 4.2-4.7-5.4. Love these sails. Powerful, fast, easily tunable on the water, and they got the S-shape lower batten that works like a charm if you want to slow things down. Ideal B&J sail.
Ops, sorry! got carried away. Freaks are nice! If, as you already noticed, slower in transitions (and slower in general). Enjoy it.
Thanks folks. For sure the correct mast will work better.
I was planing quite early though, not sure the mast helped there? I like the concept but on the other hand the sail material still need some stiffness or else we'd be using pool noodles :D !
They use long strings of kevlar to help with this. But I mean to obtain a nice foil out of soft material is a challenge for sure!
My 2 cents....
just received a 4.2 super freak Maui edition.
had it out yesterday in super gusty westerly.
Out performed expectations. Got planning fine/well. handled gusts and was even pretty good when wind dropped. great on the wave, not as instant and direct as others but better for that reason in strong gusty conditions.
pretty much ideal sail for the conditions I recon. Maybe not a perfect light wind sail? But glad I went with it for my small sail, Was a bit reluctant to initially
it also snakes pesky kiters well.
few high quality shots from yesterday
Like my 4.5 S Freak, feels heavy on land, feels light on the water.
Too powerful for me to foil into the 20's in windspeed, but good up to around 29 with 8t liter board and windsurf.
Looks like the new SFME has a lot more grid material, kind of loses the point for me which is a sail you can literally roll in a ball with the battens removed.
Personally I've owned a few and not a big fan, I probably would be if we had side-off conditions.
Prolly better for lighter wight sailors. Move and manuever rather than drag race blasting.
I use a NP Alpha in 4.5 for speed and jumping, and S Freak for swell slashing and little hops..
Finding the right board combo helps.
looks sick Dunko ... Ive sailed the full dacron SFME a fair bit ... that xply in luff and window should improve the bottom end alot I would have thought ? topend will be insane ... so comfy the sfme ... and really good for waveriding / wave tricks
Looks like the new SFME has a lot more grid material, kind of loses the point for me which is a sail you can literally roll in a ball with the battens removed.
Personally I've owned a few and not a big fan, I probably would be if we had side-off conditions.
To be honest after having owned or tested a few Freaks I ended up not really too convinced by the idea. A lot of sail makers use dacron, but only in very small sections of the sail (e.g. a strip in the luff) and it is no such a surprise that HSM is using less in the SF Maui Edition. They market it as hybrid 50% dacron and 50% "modern material". The Speedfreak went through a similar process of dacron-reduction, with the window and the luff getting some real sail fabric. But why on earth there are still large dacron panels at the trailing edge is a bit of a mystery to me. I don't understand what they are doing there, why would a heavier trailing edge panel soften the ride? It would seem to only upset the sail shape. When I tested a 6.5 speedfreak you could see the panels close to the tail of the boom visibly deform under load ...
Honestly once there is anything other than Dacron and vinyl in a sail you might as well just use regular material since you know that's where it'll fail.
Although I have Northwave sails which use Dacron trailing edges effectively.
My usual failure spots are windows and luff sleeves so really this new SFME isn't going to be more durable than any other HSM sail.
If you want a bigger inefficient sail think about taking a smaller efficient one.
...says the guy who sails Choppers! ... Hilarious!
If you want a bigger inefficient sail think about taking a smaller efficient one.
I was on a 4.2, while the mate I was sailing with was on 4.8 new Severne, i weigh more. He was probably more powered but I was still getting waves easily and power down the line
so nah not that inefficient.... you have a different experience when you sailed one?
Looks like the new SFME has a lot more grid material, kind of loses the point for me which is a sail you can literally roll in a ball with the battens removed.
Personally I've owned a few and not a big fan, I probably would be if we had side-off conditions.
Why would you want to take out the battens and roll it into a ball?
Looks like the new SFME has a lot more grid material, kind of loses the point for me which is a sail you can literally roll in a ball with the battens removed.
Personally I've owned a few and not a big fan, I probably would be if we had side-off conditions.
Why would you want to take out the battens and roll it into a ball?
My gear spends a lot of time crushed in a quiver bag for travel, it's impossible to avoid creasing the grid/mono. I tried the SFME to see if it could handle that better (it does) I just didn't like how it sails. Maybe I should revisit that though since my sailing has changed a lot in the last 2 years.
And maybe I shall take gorgesailor joke more seriously and start sailing Crazyfreak sails instead of Choppers. Although may not happen soon. lol
And maybe I shall take gorgesailor joke more seriously and start sailing Crazyfreak sails instead of Choppers. Although may not happen soon. lol
It was meant as a joke but actually you should take it seriously... The Super Freaks ME are not necessarily inefficient sails by wavesail standards. They have average power, excellent pumpability, & forward oriented draft which I equate with efficiency - though some may prefer the pure grunt of a more backhanded sail like the Chopper. That said it is all about personal preference & I have found my own which is neither Freak nor Chopper.
I don't really have quivers of "favorites", but my old SuperFreak 4.5 works great windsurfing in 17-27 and foiling in 10-20 winds.
I bought my first SuperFreaks in 2005 and have not found anything I like better since then. I currently have a 4.7, 5.3ME, 5.5, 5.8ME and a 6.3 which is great on a longboard.
Being lightweight (70kg) and living in an area where gusty wind is the norm, they have been a revelation.
I use them on flatwater as well as in waves. I recently bought a SpeedFreak 7.5 and while the camber was a challenge at first, I have become accustomed to it and love that sail like no other big sail I've ridden.
Drew
I bought my first SuperFreaks in 2005 and have not found anything I like better since then. I currently have a 4.7, 5.3ME, 5.5, 5.8ME and a 6.3 which is great on a longboard.
Being lightweight (70kg) and living in an area where gusty wind is the norm, they have been a revelation.
I use them on flatwater as well as in waves. I recently bought a SpeedFreak 7.5 and while the camber was a challenge at first, I have become accustomed to it and love that sail like no other big sail I've ridden.
Drew
I also have a quiver of MEs (3.2 to 5.3) and a single cam speed freak (6.5).
Love em
Thanks for your input. Do you mind developing your thoughts in regards to transition and wave riding? The ME is definitely an improved design for responsiveness and maybe added twist.
I bought my first SuperFreaks in 2005 and have not found anything I like better since then. I currently have a 4.7, 5.3ME, 5.5, 5.8ME and a 6.3 which is great on a longboard.
Being lightweight (70kg) and living in an area where gusty wind is the norm, they have been a revelation.
I use them on flatwater as well as in waves. I recently bought a SpeedFreak 7.5 and while the camber was a challenge at first, I have become accustomed to it and love that sail like no other big sail I've ridden.
Drew
I also have a quiver of MEs (3.2 to 5.3) and a single cam speed freak (6.5).
Love em
Well, yes of course, put some material other than dacron on half of the sail and the sail is going to be improved!
But I still do not see the rational of using the heaviest material for the trailing edge panels. I do understand using some dacron on the luff, many sailmakers do so. But using it for the trailing edge is just going to make the sail feel heavier ...
Any reasons to do so that one can divine? other than a half-hearted recognition that a dacron sail is not such a great idea? Ks3, quad, and firelights have no trace of Dacron .
Duzzi - crazily enough the Dacron isn't heavy. Jeff isn't using the tarpaulin material early Windsurfer sails were made out of, but something lighter and less stretchy. My 10.0 Speedfreak - essentially an all-dacron sail - is FOUR POUNDS lighter than my 9.3 Point7 AC1. Some of that is extra battens and cams but a lot of it is the extremely light material. It's also extremely strong compared with monofilm. My 7.5 7-batten Speedfreak is a pound and a half lighter than a 7.5 Ezzy Zephyr and much more fun to use. I've foiled on both, which I could never do with that Point7.
They're harder to tune than other sails, because it's harder to visualize the twist when on the beach, but it's pretty easy to see on the water. Not everyone likes the spongy feel they offer, but I kinda do.
Yeah, the HOT dacron is not a heavy material. Compare the two HOT 5 batten sails:
Firelight 5.3 = 3.3 kg (made primarily of "superlight" laminates)
SuperFreak 5.3 = 3.3 kg (made primarily of dacron)
I love their lightness, luffability, durability, looks, and the amazing way they handle nasty gusty wind.
I would say they are more "springy" than "spongy" :-)
Drew
Duzzi - crazily enough the Dacron isn't heavy. Jeff isn't using the tarpaulin material early Windsurfer sails were made out of, but something lighter and less stretchy. My 10.0 Speedfreak - essentially an all-dacron sail - is FOUR POUNDS lighter than my 9.3 Point7 AC1. Some of that is extra battens and cams but a lot of it is the extremely light material. It's also extremely strong compared with monofilm. My 7.5 7-batten Speedfreak is a pound and a half lighter than a 7.5 Ezzy Zephyr and much more fun to use. I've foiled on both, which I could never do with that Point7.
They're harder to tune than other sails, because it's harder to visualize the twist when on the beach, but it's pretty easy to see on the water. Not everyone likes the spongy feel they offer, but I kinda do.
Comparing a recreational freeride sail, the six battens, single cam speedfreak, with a double luff, 4 cambers, eight battens, PWA level sail? Of course the Point-7 AC1 is heavier. It will also be 10 knots faster, and you can win a world championship with it. Pick the double cam Point-7 ACZ and guess what, it is 4 pounds lighter than the AC-1. Pick the no cams ACX and you drop another pound.
But you are right that the difference in weight btw Dacron, Xply and monofilm are not that much. Performance is a difference story, and of course fabric weight depends on the thickness of the material used by a sailmaker. My Superfreak UL were lighter than regular Superfreaks, they also disintegrated quickly.
Still don't understand what one thinks to achieve by putting dacron on the trailing edge of a sail. To me it makes no sense, but what do I know: I am curious to hear what the theory is!
Duzzi - crazily enough the Dacron isn't heavy. Jeff isn't using the tarpaulin material early Windsurfer sails were made out of, but something lighter and less stretchy. My 10.0 Speedfreak - essentially an all-dacron sail - is FOUR POUNDS lighter than my 9.3 Point7 AC1. Some of that is extra battens and cams but a lot of it is the extremely light material. It's also extremely strong compared with monofilm. My 7.5 7-batten Speedfreak is a pound and a half lighter than a 7.5 Ezzy Zephyr and much more fun to use. I've foiled on both, which I could never do with that Point7.
They're harder to tune than other sails, because it's harder to visualize the twist when on the beach, but it's pretty easy to see on the water. Not everyone likes the spongy feel they offer, but I kinda do.
Thinking about adding some full race sails for speed sailing. When do you go with the AC1 over the speedfreak?
Superfreak....1st of all, sail meant for waves.
When you get your rig dragged across a rocky reef, you will learn to appreciate dacron.
Then, pounded by successive waves, you will love dacron leech panels.
Duzzi - crazily enough the Dacron isn't heavy. Jeff isn't using the tarpaulin material early Windsurfer sails were made out of, but something lighter and less stretchy. My 10.0 Speedfreak - essentially an all-dacron sail - is FOUR POUNDS lighter than my 9.3 Point7 AC1. Some of that is extra battens and cams but a lot of it is the extremely light material. It's also extremely strong compared with monofilm. My 7.5 7-batten Speedfreak is a pound and a half lighter than a 7.5 Ezzy Zephyr and much more fun to use. I've foiled on both, which I could never do with that Point7.
They're harder to tune than other sails, because it's harder to visualize the twist when on the beach, but it's pretty easy to see on the water. Not everyone likes the spongy feel they offer, but I kinda do.
Thinking about adding some full race sails for speed sailing. When do you go with the AC1 over the speedfreak?
The Point7 was a mistake, at least for me (and I'm selling it, at a loss, this weekend, I hope) although I bought it used and at barely 1/4 of full retail. It is insanely fast, as Duzzi points out, points incredibly high and will handle an unbelievable amount of wind. However, it's just brutal to rig, even using all the tricks. It requires a big pop coming out of jibes to get it to rotate and when underpowered I'm really aware of the extra weight, likewise if I'm anything but utterly committed when jibing and tacking - all this on the correct 100% Point7 mast. That's when I'm holding it up - when it's holding me up, fully powered, that's less of an issue. I'm sure I'd love the ACZ.
I've replaced it with a Sailworks NX 8.6 which is better mannered, handles just as much wind, can be foiled if need be and for someone at my level is just as fast. If I'm really overpowered I can usually just put a smaller fin on and downhaul to the limit and be fine. I don't believe I lose any low end at all versus the 9.3 AC1, because the NX is easy to pump. I'll use the NX when I know I'll be planing, so 14-20kt wind (9-14kt if I'm foiling). I use the 10.0 SF when I know it'll be up and down - 8-18kt. It's not fun when it gets up past that but the stretchy feel makes even very strong gusts manageable. It's not as fast as the NX but it's really not slow either - I have 28mph off the wind in flatwater on a Kona Carbone on that sail, which is a little nuts. Doesn't point nearly as high as the racier sails of course.
Duzzi - crazily enough the Dacron isn't heavy. Jeff isn't using the tarpaulin material early Windsurfer sails were made out of, but something lighter and less stretchy. My 10.0 Speedfreak - essentially an all-dacron sail - is FOUR POUNDS lighter than my 9.3 Point7 AC1. Some of that is extra battens and cams but a lot of it is the extremely light material. It's also extremely strong compared with monofilm. My 7.5 7-batten Speedfreak is a pound and a half lighter than a 7.5 Ezzy Zephyr and much more fun to use. I've foiled on both, which I could never do with that Point7.
They're harder to tune than other sails, because it's harder to visualize the twist when on the beach, but it's pretty easy to see on the water. Not everyone likes the spongy feel they offer, but I kinda do.
Thinking about adding some full race sails for speed sailing. When do you go with the AC1 over the speedfreak?
The Point7 was a mistake, at least for me (and I'm selling it, at a loss, this weekend, I hope) although I bought it used and at barely 1/4 of full retail. It is insanely fast, as Duzzi points out, points incredibly high and will handle an unbelievable amount of wind. However, it's just brutal to rig, even using all the tricks. It requires a big pop coming out of jibes to get it to rotate and when underpowered I'm really aware of the extra weight, likewise if I'm anything but utterly committed when jibing and tacking - all this on the correct 100% Point7 mast. That's when I'm holding it up - when it's holding me up, fully powered, that's less of an issue. I'm sure I'd love the ACZ.
I've replaced it with a Sailworks NX 8.6 which is better mannered, handles just as much wind, can be foiled if need be and for someone at my level is just as fast. If I'm really overpowered I can usually just put a smaller fin on and downhaul to the limit and be fine. I don't believe I lose any low end at all versus the 9.3 AC1, because the NX is easy to pump. I'll use the NX when I know I'll be planing, so 14-20kt wind (9-14kt if I'm foiling). I use the 10.0 SF when I know it'll be up and down - 8-18kt. It's not fun when it gets up past that but the stretchy feel makes even very strong gusts manageable. It's not as fast as the NX but it's really not slow either - I have 28mph off the wind in flatwater on a Kona Carbone on that sail, which is a little nuts. Doesn't point nearly as high as the racier sails of course.
interesting I have been seriously considering the sailworks Nx too. sounds like you like it ..