Flat Earthers

More fakery....

Select to expand quote

FormulaNova said..
Is that real? It looks fake.

Finally starting to get it are we?

When is japie going to cotton on?

It's the Thornton Bank. How about you, "do your own research" for a change?

You know what research involves right? There's words, measurement, numbers, adding and, sometimes, even subtracting. (I can understand that division is beyond you sphere of expertise).

Select to expand quote

Pcdefender said..
More fakery....

Each of the pylons and wavelets is identical, only an idiot would think that image is real.

You're not an idiot are you? (asking for a friend)

Select to expand quote

Pcdefender said..

Ya gotta love their science that the masses mostly believe but fortunately since 2020 things have changed a lot.


Beach buggies in 1969 driven on the moon - is there anyone on this forum that still believes this claptrap?

Not based on first hand verifiable physical evidence but on the opposite - faith in their story.

Planet earth looks pretty round to me. Only an idiot would think otherwise. You're not an idiot are you? (asking for a friend).

Select to expand quote

Pcdefender said..

Ya gotta love their science that the masses mostly believe but fortunately since 2020 things have changed a lot.

Beach buggies in 1969 driven on the moon - is there anyone on this forum that still believes this claptrap?

Not based on first hand verifiable physical evidence but on the opposite - faith in their story.

Select to expand quote

Pcdefender said..

Still calling anyone who disagrees with you idiots......

No, are you?

I realise reading and comprehension are not your strong points.

Select to expand quote

Pcdefender said..

FormulaNova said..
Is that real? It looks fake.

Finally starting to get it are we?

When is japie going to cotton on?

I think now that the image looks weird because of the lens they were using. I think a better photo of this is below:





But the cool thing is that its an easily accessible thing that most of us could visit and see for ourselves.

Coincidentally I was talking to someone on the weekend who's father spent most of his life working on military radio communication."Tropospheric scatter, also known as troposcatter, is a method of communicating with microwave radio signals over considerable distances - often up to 500 kilometres (310 mi) and further depending on frequency of operation, equipment type, terrain, and climate factors. This method of propagation uses the tropospheric scatter phenomenon, where radio waves at UHF and SHF frequencies are randomly scattered as they pass through the upper layers of the troposphere. Radio signals are transmitted in a narrow beam aimed just above the horizon in the direction of the receiver station. As the signals pass through the troposphere, some of the energy is scattered back toward the Earth, allowing the receiver station to pick up the signal.

Normally, signals in the microwave frequency range travel in straight lines, and so are limited to line-of-sight applications, in which the receiver can be 'seen' by the transmitter. Communication distances are limited by the visual horizon to around 48-64 kilometres (30-40 mi). Troposcatter allows microwave communication beyond the horizon. It was developed in the 1950s and used for military communications until communications satellites largely replaced it in the 1970s."

Select to expand quote

remery said..

Funny, were a flat'earther clever enough to have a job that meant they got up that high, they would still blame "lense distortion" or some other fantasy. But the first point is enough of a limitation that its never going to happen.

After reading one too many sci-fi novels I was wondering the other day if worlds where they lived in a cylinder also had crazy people that would see the curvature of the surface and insist on it not being true and somehow atmospheric distoration of a flat-earth?

Two CT moles whacked with one image. Climate change and flat Earth.

Pete, just explain where Antarctica is if you want any creditability

Select to expand quote

Pcdefender said..
Just explain the harnesses if you want any credibility?

What harnesses???? what's that got to do with Antarctica.
You posted a link to stuff in Antartica purportedly doing bad stuff, but you can't tell us where Antarctica is?

The harnesses that NASA use in their staged set videos, logic tells me they use the Flying Objects brand?

I do not pretend to know how the whole thing works but a spinning ball.....come on.

Select to expand quote

Pcdefender said..
The harnesses that NASA use in their staged set videos, logic tells me they use the Flying Objects brand?

I do not pretend to know how the whole thing works but a spinning ball.....come on.

If you don't see how a ball earth in space can work.

What shape do you think it is?

Try to think of all the evidence you have observed during your life and apply that to the model you're thinking of.

Think about your time in Scotland and why the movement of Sun, Moon, Stars are so much different to Australia.

Think about how you travelled to and from Scotland, is that trip achievable on your model?

Think about Lisa Blair's circumnavigation, is that achievable on your model?