Well decrepit, I'm not arguing anything, just presenting viewpoints.
Judging me probably shows your ego in a poor light? Dunno. I'm not telling anyone what the should or shouldn't do or think here.
I'm telling people "that's so 2020" or, that's ego etc.
I don't see conflict here, just several very closed minds with souls that are just itching to be set free.
We are all part of the One Consciousness, having a unique experience. We know instinctively when we judge others, we are really just showing the world that we are in fact, not prepared to be truly honest with ourselves.
..and once again, i didn't start the topic, nor did i start the subject about vaccines, fluoride, net zero etc. I'm joining in the fun, shooting some breeze this way and that, going with the flow ya know.
i get it, ya have an opinion about me and thanks for that. I'm good all the same. Quite able to decide how to interact all by myself believe it or not.
Hey peacenlove,
I'm interested in your thoughts on this one:
peace before love or love before peace ?
Great question oh carantoc the magnanimous.
Definitely love comes before peace but peace flows along natural right up it's little behind.
The Creator/s at that moment in the beginning of consciousness thinking "I AM!" Kinda laid it all out beautifully.
The opposites are Hate and War. These are the Money Changers specialty.
Gotta watch those vices others add . they usually come from ego, as decrepito stated.
Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..
Are you offering ad-vice on a avatar name change bro?
Is the ad-vices catch-free?
Nah, bro.
Besides, somehow I feel you may have a little more experience in changing seabreeze usernames than myself.
Glad we cleared that up.
Isn't this fun? What an agreement we now have.
Sweet!
Peace be with you.
Edit: 6800 posts! Well done!
Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..
Edit: 6800 posts! Well done!
Thanks very much.
6,800 and every single one an absolute corker.
Glad somebody here appreciates Carantoc.
Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..
Gotta watch those vices others add . they usually come from ego, as decrepito stated.
Hey p&l,
don't mean to be pedantic but I think ego has been discussed here before, several times. I was just thinking that being a new user you may not be aware. If you are then no biggie, just sayin'.
But ego doesn't deliver much. People tend to think it is the be-all and end-all, but that is not so. I find it is best to google things before you post. I think remery would agree peer review can be very helpful. Anyways, not promoting anything but Pack-n-Send seem to provide a pretty good service.
Select to expand quoteCarantoc said..peacenlove said..
Edit: 6800 posts! Well done!
Thanks very much.
6,800 and every single one an absolute corker.
Glad somebody here appreciates Carantoc.
I'm intrigued by what makes narcissists tick. Think nothing of it. You're doing just fine, but watch the exit as the soul carries the ego's equity into the next life.
Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..
...but watch the exit as the soul carries the ego's equity into the next life.
Yeah, I did that.
Although I am not sure that saying adieu and then changing your username is akin to 'the next life'.
Also, to add yet more vices, since it's widely thought by scholars of enlightenment that the soul roots itself in ego, and roots are vital to our growth it probably is best to avoid any ****-taking of the self, no matter how couched in good cheer and humour one make pretend it to be.
Risky to ad-vice, but shared in lovenpeace just for big brother C.
Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..
Well decrepit, I'm not arguing anything, just presenting viewpoints.
Judging me probably shows your ego in a poor light? Dunno. I'm not telling anyone what the should or shouldn't do or think here.
I'm telling people "that's so 2020" or, that's ego etc.
I don't see conflict here, just several very closed minds with souls that are just itching to be set free.
We are all part of the One Consciousness, having a unique experience. We know instinctively when we judge others, we are really just showing the world that we are in fact, not prepared to be truly honest with ourselves.
..and once again, i didn't start the topic, nor did i start the subject about vaccines, fluoride, net zero etc. I'm joining in the fun, shooting some breeze this way and that, going with the flow ya know.
i get it, ya have an opinion about me and thanks for that. I'm good all the same. Quite able to decide how to interact all by myself believe it or not.
I think your comments probably shows your intelligence in a poor light? Dunno.
Select to expand quoteCarantoc said..
Hey peacenlove,
I'm interested in your thoughts on this one:
peace before love or love before peace ?
You're going to confuse him/her.
Something to ponder . page 20 and 27 should concern the sceptics critical thinkers. Feel free to peer review it. Even if you're not a "scientist", or dentist.
docs.google.com/document/d/1c2uh9pviAV1F-CPM_41VxWJ91xTDUP2FrNMDh2uQDvM/edit?tab=t.0
Oncology Professor Angus Dalgleish: x.com/newstart_2024/status/1802073470685036618 (with apologies to Remery for quoting an "actual and highly respected scientist")
and, here's the other half of the online debate:
docs.google.com/document/d/1mFuduR7b0YBfjXYTwNkv5pB-tioKzRbhgrMacknjh1k/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.4bcbkghlcgh8
Select to expand quoteCarantoc said..
Glad somebody here appreciates Carantoc.
I don't.
Select to expand quoteCarantoc said..
Hey p&l,
don't mean to be pedantic but I think ego has been discussed here before, several times. I was just thinking that being a new user you may not be aware. If you are then no biggie, just sayin'.
But ego doesn't deliver much. People tend to think it is the be-all and end-all, but that is not so. I find it is best to google things before you post. I think remery would agree peer review can be very helpful. Anyways, not promoting anything but Pack-n-Send seem to provide a pretty good service.
I think P&L may have confused Ego with... Education, Understanding, Experience. Perhaps even IQ (but non necessarily).
Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..
Something to ponder . page 20 and 27 should concern the sceptics critical thinkers. Feel free to peer review it. Even if you're not a "scientist", or dentist.
docs.google.com/document/d/1c2uh9pviAV1F-CPM_41VxWJ91xTDUP2FrNMDh2uQDvM/edit?tab=t.0
Oncology Professor Angus Dalgleish: x.com/newstart_2024/status/1802073470685036618 (with apologies to Remery for quoting an "actual and highly respected scientist")
and, here's the other half of the online debate:
docs.google.com/document/d/1mFuduR7b0YBfjXYTwNkv5pB-tioKzRbhgrMacknjh1k/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.4bcbkghlcgh8
Are you talking about Gus Dalgleish, head of the Department of Oncology, Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism at St Georges Hospital Medical School, London? I'm not seeing much about virology or epidemiology.
Isn't this topic supposed to be about scepticism and critical thinking? There's two very detailed and well researched papers above on whether the CV-19 vaxx "saved more or killed more" for review.
The arctic sea ice is still bigger than in 2012 despite the BBC's story. BBC = Zero Credibility.
Tim Flannery = Zero Credibility.
Greta Iceberg = Zero Credibility
Select to expand quoteremery said..peacenlove said..
Something to ponder . page 20 and 27 should concern the sceptics critical thinkers. Feel free to peer review it. Even if you're not a "scientist", or dentist.
docs.google.com/document/d/1c2uh9pviAV1F-CPM_41VxWJ91xTDUP2FrNMDh2uQDvM/edit?tab=t.0
Oncology Professor Angus Dalgleish: x.com/newstart_2024/status/1802073470685036618 (with apologies to Remery for quoting an "actual and highly respected scientist")
and, here's the other half of the online debate:
docs.google.com/document/d/1mFuduR7b0YBfjXYTwNkv5pB-tioKzRbhgrMacknjh1k/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.4bcbkghlcgh8
Are you talking about Gus Dalgleish, head of the Department of Oncology, Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism at St Georges Hospital Medical School, London?I'm not seeing much about virology or epidemiology.
Always going the personal angle hey? The issue is whether these turbo cancer spikes are caused by the CV-19 boosters, since there's a direct temporal correlation and no other obvious reason to date. Dalgleish has also done papers on vaccines. Medicine is not as simple as you appear to believe - all in neat little boxes.
I happen to directly know of one certified CV-19 vaccine turbo cancer death. Certified by the dead man's oncologist.
There's 40 pages in one paper and 23 in the other. Lots to read before you put the whole thing in the "Zero Credibility" bin along with the BBC, Flannery and Greta.
Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..
Always going the personal angle hey?Select to expand quote
Tim Flannery = Zero Credibility.
Idiot.
Select to expand quoteCarantoc said..peacenlove said..
Edit: 6800 posts! Well done!
Thanks very much.
Glad somebody here appreciates Carantoc.
Yeah but he had to make an alias first.
Social suicide to show you any apreciation on ya main account 
Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..
Always going the personal angle hey? The issue is whether these turbo cancer spikes are caused by the CV-19 boosters, since there's a direct temporal correlation and no other obvious reason to date. Dalgleish has also done papers on vaccines. Medicine is not as simple as you appear to believe - all in neat little boxes.
I happen to directly know of one certified CV-19 vaccine turbo cancer death. Certified by the dead man's oncologist.
There's 40 pages in one paper and 23 in the other. Lots to read before you put the whole thing in the "Zero Credibility" bin along with the BBC, Flannery and Greta.
Hey Pete, whining about the personal angle again. Nice try cooker.
Select to expand quoteremery said..peacenlove said..
Always going the personal angle hey?
Tim Flannery = Zero Credibility.
Idiot.
Love you too brother
Select to expand quoteremery said..peacenlove said..
Always going the personal angle hey? The issue is whether these turbo cancer spikes are caused by the CV-19 boosters, since there's a direct temporal correlation and no other obvious reason to date. Dalgleish has also done papers on vaccines. Medicine is not as simple as you appear to believe - all in neat little boxes.
I happen to directly know of one certified CV-19 vaccine turbo cancer death. Certified by the dead man's oncologist.
There's 40 pages in one paper and 23 in the other. Lots to read before you put the whole thing in the "Zero Credibility" bin along with the BBC, Flannery and Greta.
Hey Pete, whining about the personal angle again. Nice try cooker.
Who's Pete and just what does he have to do with scepticism and critical thinking or the poor guy killed by the vaxxine?
Or Dalgleish's work?
Scepticism and critical thinking: Cornerstones of scientific inquiry.
COVID: "Trust the science".
CLIMATE SCAM: "The science is settled".
These sound like propaganda to me, not the statements of rational minds.
Select to expand quotepeacenlove said..
Who's Pete and just what does he have to do with scepticism and critical thinking.
Pete has been on this forum for decades under a few different usernames. I think he may have recently retired after being suspended again.
Best known for his opinions as a flat earther, anti-vaxxer, a 9/11 conspiracy theorist and his alternative opinions on just about everything else.
The social media algorithms guided him to the alt-right so he was quite familiar with zero credibility websites like zeroHedge, bitChute, aussie17 and others - quoting them regularly.
Pete was dogmatic, but came across as good natured, he wasn't particularly odious or 'shouty'. It would be out of character for him to resurface again as peacenlove.
Select to expand quotemyscreenname said..
Pete was dogmatic, but came across as good natured, he wasn't particularly odious or 'shouty'. It would be out of character for him to resurface again as peacenlove.
Totally agree, Pete's various aliases all sounded the same. only sounded normal when he was talking windsurfing.
The rest of the time quite illogical, but never intentionally being nasty.
Select to expand quotedecrepit said..myscreenname said..
Pete was dogmatic, but came across as good natured, he wasn't particularly odious or 'shouty'. It would be out of character for him to resurface again as peacenlove.
Totally agree, Pete's various aliases all sounded the same. only sounded normal when he was talking windsurfing.
The rest of the time quite illogical, but never intentionally being nasty.
Agree on most of that, but I don't agree that Pete should be excused for being unintentionally nasty. Just because he didn't apply enough thought to how his words and bigoted ideas could affect others does not make his statements benign. Case in point, he got banned for posting Nazi imagery.
I'd put a fiver on peacenlove being an architect, living on the Sth Coast of NSW.
Mr Milk would know.
